Self-driving cars are better at responding to pedestrians and cyclist. Then there’s that road rage thing. Fast Company reports.
he best way to accomplish Vision Zero–the ambitious plan currently under way to completely eliminate traffic-related fatalities in New York City–may be to nix drivers altogether. Although road design is a factor in encouraging higher speeds, the city’s action plan for the program makes it clear that drivers are the problem: “Dangerous driver choices are the primary or contributing factor in 70% of pedestrian fatalities,” the plan states.
If Google’s latest demonstration of its self-driving car software is any indication, the most effective way to make our streets safer might just be to design the driver out of the equation–because robot drivers are far better than humans at sharing the road with pedestrians and cyclists. Unlike humans, self-driving cars don’t make dangerous choices.
Importantly, an autonomous vehicle doesn’t experience road rage. It won’t get impatient waiting for pedestrians to cross the street, or annoyed when a cyclist weaves in and out of lanes. “We still have lots of problems to solve” before self-driving cars can become commonplace, Urmson admits, but it’s obvious that those cars are inherently more polite than the typical urban driver.
And here lies what could be one of the autonomous vehicle’s greatest strengths (aside from the ability to turn into a mobile office): It’s designed to follow the rules, something we can’t always expect of people.